Tomohiro Masabayashi vs Nathaniel Lammons Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 07 Sep at 03:34 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Masabayashi vs N. Lammons

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Masabayashi 1 - 0 Lammons
They have played 3 sets in total, with Tomohiro Masabayashi winning 1 and Nathaniel Lammons winning 2. The last match between Tomohiro Masabayashi and Nathaniel Lammons was at the Guangzhou Challenger, 08-09-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Nathaniel Lammons getting the victory 5-7 7-5 1-2 ret..
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Masabayashi | 1 |
| Lammons | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Guangzhou Challenger(09-08-25)
T. Masabayashi vs N. Lammons H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 50.96% (133-128) | Career Total W/L | 53.42% (78-68) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
T. Masabayashi vs N. Lammons Match Preview:
- Recent performance in second serve points shows Lammons at 0% compared to Masabayashi's 43.67%. Why is this important? Serving consistency is crucial for maintaining pressure on opponents.
- Lammons has not won any return points against second serves recently, whereas Masabayashi has managed to claim 42.99%. This suggests Masabayashi's stronger return game offers a significant advantage.
- When facing first serves, Lammons again remains at 0% success, indicating struggles, while Masabayashi holds a 26.55% success rate. Could this stat influence the match's outcome? Yes, as return effectiveness often dictates match momentum.
- Analyzing performance under pressure, Lammons has saved 0% of breakpoints in the last 6 months compared to Masabayashi's 46.08%. This demonstrates Masabayashi's ability to handle critical situations better.
- In terms of overall match performance over the past year, Lammons has not secured any wins (W/L 0/0), whereas Masabayashi has a win rate of 38.46% (W/L 20/32). This indicates a disparity in competitive match experience and success.
- Lammons performs best on hard surfaces with a 61% career win rate. However, there's no recent match success to supplement this statistic. Masabayashi prefers clay, holding a 53% win rate, showing versatility on different surfaces might be less impactful without recent form consideration.
- The average rank of opponents faced by Masabayashi is around 484.87, suggesting a certain level of challenge faced. Lammons' opponent ranking data is missing, which limits the direct comparison here.
- If the match proceeds to a deciding set, Masabayashi with a 25% win rate in such scenarios (compared to Lammons's 0%) might prove more resilient.
- Looking at break-point conversion rates, Lammons has been unable to capitalize on such opportunities, whereas Masabayashi has been able to convert 38.1% of chances. This is crucial for converting critical match points into victories.
Editorial Prediction (September 7, 2025, UTC):
In analyzing recent performance trends, Masabayashi holds a stark advantage in several key areas over Lammons, particularly in second serve points and return games. These are pivotal in gaining control in ongoing matches.
Additionally, Masabayashi's ability to manage stress points during matches, such as breakpoint saves and conversions, underscores their competitive edge. This trait often defines match outcomes.
Another essential factor to consider is Masabayashi's experience, illustrated by their recent match record and ability to rally in deciding sets. Such resilience often forecasts potential match winners.
Given the presented data and comparative analysis, Masabayashi is favored to win the upcoming match against Lammons, barring sudden changes in form or unforeseen in-game events.
Tomohiro Masabayashi vs Nathaniel Lammons Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Masabayashi vs N. Lammons H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 13 | Games Won | 14 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 13 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:38:9 | Average Match Time | 1:38:9 |
| 58% (45/78) | 1st Serve % | 63% (45/71) |
| 73% (33/45) | 1st Serve Win % | 78% (35/45) |
| 55% (18/33) | 2nd Serve Win % | 65% (17/26) |
| 50% (2/4) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (2/4) |
| 27% (19/71) | Return Points Win % | 35% (27/78) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑5 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Masabayashi Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | W | 7-6(6) 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-7(1) 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-0 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 3-6 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-0 | ||
N. Lammons Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 5-7 7-5 1-2 ret. | ||
Q1 | L | 6-0 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 4-6 7-6(4) | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-6(2) 6-7(9) 6-4 | ||

T. Masabayashi vs N. Lammons Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50.96% (133/128) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.42% (78/68) |
| 50.68% (297/289) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.46% (188/151) |
| 50.56% (2679/2620) | Games Win/Loss | 52.85% (1681/1500) |
| 51.43% (108/102) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.24% (50/33) |
| 53.13% (17/15) | Clay Win/Loss | 45.45% (10/12) |
| 42.11% (8/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45.00% (18/22) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.3 |
| 357 | Aces Total | 463 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 297 | Total Double Faults | 233 |
| 1:1:47 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 389.12 | Average Opponent Rank | 397.55 |
| 60% (6248/10375) | 1st Serve % | 60% (3350/5549) |
| 63% (3933/6248) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (2359/3350) |
| 48% (1985/4127) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (1061/2199) |
| 45% (462/1024) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (162/401) |
| 39% (3984/10088) | Return Points Win % | 35% (1907/5473) |
| 33.33% (3/6) | Challenger W/L | 33.33% (13/26) |
| 51.59% (130/122) | Futures W/L | 60.75% (65/42) |
| 50% (129/257) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (78/145) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 38% (16/42) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (24/46) |
| 47% (31/66) | Deciding Set Win % | 35% (16/46) |
| 87% (135/118) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (83/68) |
| 13% (135/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (83/15) |
| 11% (126/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (63/11) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Eva Vedder vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

Shintaro Mochizuki vs Federico Arnaboldi Prediction – ATP Bergamo Challenger – 18th November 2025 Best Bets

Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
