Tomohiro Masabayashi vs Nathaniel Lammons Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

Published on 07 Sep at 03:34 PM UTC

HEAD TO HEAD

T. Masabayashi vs N. Lammons

Tomohiro Masabayashi
Tomohiro Masabayashi

Flag JPN JPN

l
w
l
w
w
l
l
l
l
w
Nathaniel Lammons
Nathaniel Lammons

Flag USA USA

l
l
w
w
l
l
l
l
l
l

1

Win

1

Played

0

Win

27
Age
32
-
Height
5'11" (180 cm)
867
C. Rank
595
707
Best Rank
591
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Masabayashi 1 - 0 Lammons

They have played 3 sets in total, with Tomohiro Masabayashi winning 1 and Nathaniel Lammons winning 2. The last match between Tomohiro Masabayashi and Nathaniel Lammons was at the Guangzhou Challenger, 08-09-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Nathaniel Lammons getting the victory 5-7 7-5 1-2 ret..

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Masabayashi1
Lammons0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(Q1Guangzhou Challenger(09-08-25)

Hard
JPN Flag
Tomohiro Masabayashi
5
7
1
USA Flag
Nathaniel Lammons
7
5
2

T. Masabayashi vs N. Lammons H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$0
50.96% (133-128)Career Total W/L53.42% (78-68)
1Hard0
1Total H2H Matches0
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

T. Masabayashi vs N. Lammons Match Preview:

  • Recent performance in second serve points shows Lammons at 0% compared to Masabayashi's 43.67%. Why is this important? Serving consistency is crucial for maintaining pressure on opponents.
  • Lammons has not won any return points against second serves recently, whereas Masabayashi has managed to claim 42.99%. This suggests Masabayashi's stronger return game offers a significant advantage.
  • When facing first serves, Lammons again remains at 0% success, indicating struggles, while Masabayashi holds a 26.55% success rate. Could this stat influence the match's outcome? Yes, as return effectiveness often dictates match momentum.
  • Analyzing performance under pressure, Lammons has saved 0% of breakpoints in the last 6 months compared to Masabayashi's 46.08%. This demonstrates Masabayashi's ability to handle critical situations better.
  • In terms of overall match performance over the past year, Lammons has not secured any wins (W/L 0/0), whereas Masabayashi has a win rate of 38.46% (W/L 20/32). This indicates a disparity in competitive match experience and success.
  • Lammons performs best on hard surfaces with a 61% career win rate. However, there's no recent match success to supplement this statistic. Masabayashi prefers clay, holding a 53% win rate, showing versatility on different surfaces might be less impactful without recent form consideration.
  • The average rank of opponents faced by Masabayashi is around 484.87, suggesting a certain level of challenge faced. Lammons' opponent ranking data is missing, which limits the direct comparison here.
  • If the match proceeds to a deciding set, Masabayashi with a 25% win rate in such scenarios (compared to Lammons's 0%) might prove more resilient.
  • Looking at break-point conversion rates, Lammons has been unable to capitalize on such opportunities, whereas Masabayashi has been able to convert 38.1% of chances. This is crucial for converting critical match points into victories.

Editorial Prediction (September 7, 2025, UTC):

In analyzing recent performance trends, Masabayashi holds a stark advantage in several key areas over Lammons, particularly in second serve points and return games. These are pivotal in gaining control in ongoing matches.

Additionally, Masabayashi's ability to manage stress points during matches, such as breakpoint saves and conversions, underscores their competitive edge. This trait often defines match outcomes.

Another essential factor to consider is Masabayashi's experience, illustrated by their recent match record and ability to rally in deciding sets. Such resilience often forecasts potential match winners.

Given the presented data and comparative analysis, Masabayashi is favored to win the upcoming match against Lammons, barring sudden changes in form or unforeseen in-game events.

Tomohiro Masabayashi vs Nathaniel Lammons Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

T. Masabayashi vs N. Lammons H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
1Sets Won2
13Games Won14
7Aces (Total)13
3Total Double Faults1
1:38:9Average Match Time1:38:9
58% (45/78)1st Serve %63% (45/71)
73% (33/45)1st Serve Win %78% (35/45)
55% (18/33)2nd Serve Win %65% (17/26)
50% (2/4)Break Pts Won %50% (2/4)
27% (19/71)Return Points Win %35% (27/78)
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑5 Win %0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)1st Set Won, Won Match100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Masabayashi 45%, Lammons 65%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Masabayashi 44%, Lammons 45%.
Break Points Saved %: Masabayashi 47%, Lammons 50%.

T. Masabayashi Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardM15 Kuala Lumpur - 17-11-2025

R1

INAA. Susanto
W
7-6(6) 6-2
HardM15 Kuala Lumpur - 10-11-2025

R1

RUSE. Karlovskiy
L
6-3 6-7(1) 6-1
HardM25 Qian Daohu - 27-10-2025

R1

BLRM. Haliak
L
6-4 6-0
HardM25 Huzhou - 20-10-2025

R1

TPEK. Lee
L
6-2 3-6 6-2
HardM25 Takasaki - 15-09-2025

R1

JPNH. Shiraishi
L
6-2 6-0

N. Lammons Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardGuangzhou Challenger - 08-09-2025

Q1

JPNT. Masabayashi
L
5-7 7-5 1-2 ret.
I.hardCharlottesville Challenger - 01-11-2021

Q1

NEDG. Brouwer
L
6-0 6-2
I.hardMouilleron-Le-Captif Challenger - 04-10-2021

Q1

GERM. Rosenkranz
L
6-4 4-6 7-6(4)
ClaySzczecin Challenger - 13-09-2021

Q1

GERN. Kuhn
L
6-3 6-4
GrassNottingham 1 Challenger - 07-06-2021

Q1

CROB. Gojo
L
7-6(2) 6-7(9) 6-4
banner

T. Masabayashi vs N. Lammons Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
50.96% (133/128)YTD Win/Loss53.42% (78/68)
50.68% (297/289)Sets Win/Loss55.46% (188/151)
50.56% (2679/2620)Games Win/Loss52.85% (1681/1500)
51.43% (108/102)Hard Win/Loss60.24% (50/33)
53.13% (17/15)Clay Win/Loss45.45% (10/12)
42.11% (8/11)Indoor Hard W/L45.00% (18/22)
0% (0/0)Grass Win/Loss0.00% (0/1)
0.14Aces Per Game0.3
357Aces Total463
0.11Double Faults Per Game0.15
297Total Double Faults233
1:1:47Average Match Time1st Match
389.12Average Opponent Rank397.55
60% (6248/10375)1st Serve %60% (3350/5549)
63% (3933/6248)1st Serve Win %70% (2359/3350)
48% (1985/4127)2nd Serve Win %48% (1061/2199)
45% (462/1024)Break Points Won % (Total)40% (162/401)
39% (3984/10088)Return Points Win %35% (1907/5473)
33.33% (3/6)Challenger W/L33.33% (13/26)
51.59% (130/122)Futures W/L60.75% (65/42)
50% (129/257)Best of 3 Sets Win %54% (78/145)
100% (1/1)Best of 5 Sets Win %0% (0/1)
38% (16/42)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)52% (24/46)
47% (31/66)Deciding Set Win %35% (16/46)
87% (135/118)1st Set Won, Won Match82% (83/68)
13% (135/17)1st Set Won, Lost Match18% (83/15)
11% (126/14)1st Set Lost, Won Match17% (63/11)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

03:15 AM 19/11/25
Prediction
ECUE. CamachoWC
ECUA. G. Meza4
W1
8.6
W2
1.029
12:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction
ITAS. NapolitanoPR
FINO. Virtanen3
W1
3.84
W2
1.21
12:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction
ESTD. Glinka
GERT. Gentzsch
W1
1.58
W2
2.2
12:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction
KAZB. Zhukayev
SRBM. Topo
W1
1.84
W2
1.84
02:00 AM 19/11/25
Prediction
AUSJ. McCabe5
INDK. Singh
W1
1.25
W2
3.48
01:45 AM 19/11/25
Prediction
ECUA. Andrade9
ROUS. Gima
W1
1.165
W2
4.4